Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 550 So. 2d 1028 - Mann v. Mann

550 So. 2d 1028 - Mann v. Mann’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 2016 · most notably 578 So. 2d 1346 - Frasemer v. Frasemer (1991), 589 So. 2d 1303 - Phillippi v. State Ex Rel. Burke (1991)

26 state decisions

1801989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morgan v. Morgan · 239 Mo. App. 932 - Cervantes v. Cervantes · Whitt v. Whitt · Wood v. Wood · Hall v. Hall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A mother may not waive support payments due a minor child from its father under a decree of the court, nor may support provisions of the decree be nullified by agreement between the parents. The court was without authority to release or discharge the father from . . . support payments which had matured and become due under the original divorce decree. . . ."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"The parents are without any warrant in law to later nullify [a final decree] by mutual agreement between themselves so as to deprive the minor children of the support to which they are entitled under the decree of a court of competent jurisdiction. Such agreements are without consideration, and void as a matter of public policy."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The dispositive issue is whether the parties to a divorce action can subsequently modify the child support provisions of the judgment without court approval and ratification. That question has previously been answered in the negative.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.