Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

550 So. 2d 1182

550 So.2d 1182

14 Fla.L.Weekly 2535

E.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 31, 1989

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-10-31

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 2009

Relies on 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-10-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The trial court acted within the bounds of sound discretion in excluding certain of respondent’s statements which had not been disclosed to the defense in discovery. Other statements about which respondent complains were actually made known to the defense in pretrial deposition. The procedure followed by the trial court was consistent with Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971).

¶2Affirmed.

/550/so2d/1182 · .json · Public domain