Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

550 So. 2d 1190

550 So.2d 1190

14 Fla.L.Weekly 2546

Waller v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 2, 1989

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-11-02

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 1994

4 state decisions

Relies on 532 So. 2d 71 - Hamrick v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-11-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The trial court has the responsibility to determine the correct amount of restitution under section 948.03(l)(e), Florida Statutes, and in this case erred in delegating its responsibility to the probation officer. See Hamrick v. State, 532 So.2d 71 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). The appellant’s other point on appeal is without merit.

¶2That part of the order of probation providing for restitution to be determined by the probation officer is reversed and the cause is remanded for the trial court to determine the correct amount of restitution, after notice and hearing.

¶3AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

COWART and GOSHORN, JJ., and HARRIS, Associate Judge, concur.
/550/so2d/1190 · .json · Public domain