Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 550 SO2D 1208 - Ballard v. Mook

Ballard v. Mook’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2013
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 2013

3 state decisions

201989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Canter v. Koehring Company · 511 So. 2d 446 - Miller v. East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff's Dept. · 390 So. 2d 842 - Hibernia Nat. Bank of New Orleans v. Bolleter · Ward v. Board of Levee Com'rs of Orleans Levee Dist. · Pizanie v. Gauthreaux

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “probable cause to file suit is a question which depends upon particular facts as perceived by the person bringing the action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.