Rovira v. Rovira’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2006
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 61 (Payment-in-Kind Tax Treatment Act of 1983) · 26 U.S.C. § 71
Relies on Hughes v. Hughes · 178 W. Va. 563 - Cross v. Cross · Lincoln v. Lincoln · 143 Wis. 2d 166 - Marriage of Pergolski v. Pergolski · 166 Mich. App. 58 - Lorenz v. Lorenz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n opposite conclusion would result in a waste of money for the entire family unit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rovira v. Mire
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.