550 So. 2d 1356 - Comberrel v. Basford’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
25 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Canter v. Koehring Company · 373 So. 2d 498 - Reck v. Stevens · Hildebrand v. Social Security Administration · Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Russell · 418 So. 2d 575 - Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Attempts to measure in money such intangibles as grief, loss of love and affection, and loss of companionship are subjective and discretionary....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“in Louisiana. That case does not stand for the proposition that UM coverage cannot exist absent liability coverage under an insurance policy.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The following persons/organizations are covered under this form: (1) The Protected Person(s) for any covered auto. (2) Anyone else while using with your permission a covered auto you own, hire or borrow.... (3) Anyone liable for the conduct of the Protected Person(s) or permissive user described above is also covered, but only to the extent of that liability. The CIGNA policy provides: For any covered "auto" you own, this Coverage Form provides primary insurance. For any covered "auto" you don't own, the insurance provided by this Coverage Form is excess over any other collectible insurance ... [Emphasis added.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.