550 So. 2d 249 - State v. Holmes’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 2004
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Manson v. Brathwaite · 446 So. 2d 729 - State v. Prudholm · 404 So. 2d 929 - State v. Bickham · 450 So. 2d 611 - State v. Gabriel · 526 So. 2d 352 - State v. Guillot
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In Manson , the court considered these five factors in determining whether the identification was suggestive: (1) the witness's opportunity to view the defendant at the time the crime was committed; (2) the degree of attention paid by the witness during the commission of the crime; (3) the accuracy of any prior description; (4) the level of the witness's certainty displayed at the time of identification; and (5) the length of time elapsed between the crime and the identification.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hunter · State v. Parker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.