Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 550 So. 2d 406 - Smith v. State

550 So. 2d 406 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

165
cited by 165 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 164 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 165 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 691 So. 2d 948 - Herring v. State (1997), 604 So. 2d 280 - Fleming v. State (1992)

1 federal appellate · 164 state decisions

7801989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Strunk v. United States · 512 So. 2d 868 - Williamson v. State · 535 So. 2d 1371 - Vickery v. State · 419 So. 2d 194 - Clay Bohn Chrysler, Inc. v. Lizana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 165 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Until there is some delay which is presumptively prejudicial, there is no necessity for inquiry into the other factors that go into the balance.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Unless good cause be shown, and a continuance duly granted by the court, all offenses for which indictments are presented to the court shall be tried no later than two hundred seventy (270) days after the accused has been arraigned.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “time of a formal indictment or information or else the actual restraints imposed by arrest and holding to a criminal charge.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.