550 So. 2d 416 - Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2012
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 437 So. 2d 410 - Tedford v. Dempsey · 537 So. 2d 435 - Cheatham v. Cheatham · 532 So. 2d 574 - Jones v. Jones · McNally v. McNally · 231 So. 2d 793 - Harrell v. Harrell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“has the authority to order an equitable division of jointly accumulated property and in doing so to look behind the formal state of title.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“Services and in kind contributions have an economic value as real as cash contributions. In such situations, where one party to the relationship acts without compensation to perform work or render services to a business enterprise or performs work or services generally regarded as domestic in nature, these are nevertheless economic contributions. They are to be valued by reference to the cost of similar services in the marketplace.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“we begin with the presumption that co-owners of jointly held property are equal co-contributors and owners. Where in acquiring such property one spouse has made substantially larger cash contributions, we presume that spouse has given a one-half interest to the other.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.