Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

550 So. 2d 543

Docket No. 89-2032.

RP v. State

R.P., a Child, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 25, 1989.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-10-25

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1991

3 state decisions

Relies on 544 So. 2d 1175 - BEO v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-10-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Howard H. Babb, Jr., Public Defender and Daniel J. Snow, Asst. Public Defender, Tavares, for petitioner.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Pamela D. Cichon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for respondent.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Petitioner, a child, has been in secure detention for more than five days after being committed to the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, contrary to section 959.12, Florida Statutes and seeks a writ of habeas corpus. The State's response concedes that the child has not been placed within the time limit provided, but contends that none of the designated placement options are immediately *544 available. In B.E.O. v. State,544 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) this court held that section 959.12 is mandatory and the child must be removed from detention within five days, therefore the petition for writ of habeas corpus is granted and the writ is issued.

¶5WRIT ISSUED.

¶6DANIEL, C.J., and SHARP and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

/550/so2d/543 · .json · Public domain