¶1We reverse and remand for a new trial in regard to appellant’s first point concerning the trial court’s application of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 8.250. See Andino v. State, 547 So.2d 1046 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). We find no merit in appellant’s re*554maining arguments, concerning the admissibility of a taped telephonic conversation and entrapment.
¶2REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR NEW TRIAL.