550 So. 2d 847 - State v. Lambert’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2011
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Lombard v. Marcera · 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno · 433 So. 2d 688 - State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining whether the ruling on a defendant's motion to suppress is correct, an appellate court is not limited to the evidence adduced at the hearing on the motion but may also consider pertinent evidence given at the trial. State v. Burkhalter, 428 So.2d 449 (La.1983); State v. Beals, 410 So.2d 745 (La.1982).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.