State v. Sanderson’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 2010
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 844 (§ 404 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Forbes · Duke v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we do not believe the legislature had any intention of placing a protective cloak around anyone who procures a prescription with no intent to deliver it to the ultimate consumer or who procures it by fraud, misrepresentation or deceit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Schuller v. State“issued by a licensed practitioner, acting in good faith and in accord with accepted medical standards....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Schuller v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.