Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 550 SW2D 25 - Armstrong v. State

Armstrong v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
1
states following
February 2013
most recently cited

86 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently February 2013 · most notably Livingston v. State (1987), Woods v. State (1997)

86 state decisions

58019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Adams v. Williams · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce · Strunk v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Fourth Amendment does not require a policeman who lacks the precise level of information necessary for probable cause to arrest to simply shrug his shoulders and allow a crime to occur or a criminal to escape. * * * A brief stop of a suspicious individual, in order to determine his identity or to maintain the status quo momentarily while obtaining more information may be most reasonable in light of the facts then known.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “In order to justify an intrusion, by means of physical force or show of authority, however slight it might be, the officer involved must be able to point to specific and articulable facts which in light of his experience and general knowledge taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.