Rogers v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rhodes v. State · Gustafson v. State · West v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. Then, just as now, the theft statute did not obviously support such a blanket conclusion. The current theft statute has remained substantively identical to the version cited in Gustafson . It identifies two methods of committing theft of property:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Rogers v. State“). Id. at 288-89 , 590 S.W.2d at 859 . So far, so good. Without analysis, however, the court then reached the abrupt conclusion that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Rogers v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.