Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 550 SW3D 438 - Shabazz v. State

Shabazz v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · Brewer v. Williams · Roe, Warden v. Flores-Ortega · Mempa v. Rhay

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the suppression court determines that evidence is admissible, that determination is final, conclusive, and binding at trial. In fact, the court's decision on a motion to suppress may often spell the difference between a conviction or an acquittal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.