Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 551 F.2d 213 - Van-S-Aviation Corp. v. Piper Aircraft Corp.

Van-S-Aviation Corp. v. Piper Aircraft Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

551 F.2d 213 · 1977

Citation profile

133
cited by 133 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
12
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

49 federal appellate · 7 district · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 133 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2019 · most notably Houston v. Lack (1988), Armstrong v. McAlpin (1980)

49 federal appellate · 7 district · 23 state decisions — followed in 12 states

39019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Weatherford v. Bursey · International Ass'n of Machinists v. Duckworth · Stassen for President Citizens Committee v. Jordan · Cities Service Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 133 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he effect of a voluntary dismissal without prejudice is to render the proceedings a nullity and leave the parties as if the action had never been brought.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “carries down with it previous proceedings and orders in the action, and all pleadings, both of plaintiff and defendant, and all issues, with respect to plaintiff's claim.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) [T]he issue sought to be precluded must be the same as that involved in the prior action; (2) that issue must have been actually litigated; (3) it must have been determined by a valid and final judgment; and (4) that determination must have been essential to the prior judgment. Haize v. Hanover Ins. Co., 536 F.2d 576 , 579 (3d Cir. 1976); see IB J. Moore, Federal Practice 0.443[1] (2d ed. 1974); Restatement (Second) of Judgments, Tent.Draft No. 1, § 68 (March 28, 1973).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.