Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 551 F.2d 662 - Barrett v. Roberts

Barrett v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis

551 F.2d 662 · 1977

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
May 2011
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2011

4 federal appellate · 3 district ·

14019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 601 (§ 401 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Goldberg v. Kelly · Roe v. Wade · Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroy · Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath · Hannah v. Larche

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether there is a substantial likelihood that plaintiff will succeed on the merits; (2) whether there is a substantial threat that the plaintiff will suffer irreparable harm unless the preliminary injunction is granted; (3) whether the threatened injury to the plaintiff if the injunctive relief is denied outweighs the possible harm to the defendant if the relief is granted; and (4) whether the issuance of injunctive relief will serve the public interest.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If the recipient requests a hearing within the timely notice period: (i) Assistance shall not be suspended, reduced, discontinued or terminated . . ..”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.