Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 551 F.2d 680 - Lumpkin v. Ricketts

Lumpkin v. Ricketts’s Empirical Analysis

551 F.2d 680 · 1977

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
1
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently April 2011 · most notably Jones v. Wj Estelle (1983), Goodwin v. Balkcom (1982)

35 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

44019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Francis v. Henderson · Whitus v. State of Georgia Whitus · Davis v. United States · Lefkowitz v. Newsome

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[t]his assertion ... would effectively eliminate any requirement of showing cause at all. If a petitioner could not demonstrate any legitimate cause, he would only have to raise the spectre of ineffective assistance of counsel to get his challenge heard. This we refuse to sanction.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The right to object to the composition of the grand or traverse jury will be deemed waived under this section, unless the person challenging the sentence shows in the petition and satisfies the court that cause exists for his being allowed to pursue the objection after the conviction and sentence has otherwise become final.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.