Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 551 F.2d 741 - Hahn v. Becker

Hahn v. Becker’s Empirical Analysis

551 F.2d 741 · 1977

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
4
states following
June 1995
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 1995 · most notably Collins v. State (1987), Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. David Geoffrey & Associates (1990)

11 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

200197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bandy v. United States · Keohane v. Swarco, Inc. · Swam v. United States · Hudson v. Atchison · Nugent v. Yellow Cab Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In reviewing the motion, we are inclined to conclude that the relief sought by the defendants is correction of errors of law and is not of the type contemplated by Rule 60. As this court has emphasized, it will not permit parties to circumvent the service requirement of Rule 59(e) by merely denominating the motion as one made under Rule 60. [Citing Swam.] The district court was correct in its construction of the Motion to Set Aside Judgment and the motion, not having been timely served, was a nullity and properly denied.” 551 F.2d, at 745 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Accordingly, we hold today that a Rule 50(b) Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict need not necessarily be served within ten days after entry of judgment, provided, however, that it is filed within ten days after entry of judgment. “In summation, a Rule 50(b) Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict must be filed within ten days after entry of judgment and served within a reasonable time thereafter.” Pp. 744, 745.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “move[d] to have the verdict and any judgment entered thereon set aside.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.