Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 551 F.2d 991 - United States v. Himmelwright

United States v. Himmelwright’s Empirical Analysis

551 F.2d 991 · 1977

Citation profile

135
cited by 135 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
November 2019
most recently cited

104 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 135 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2019 · most notably United States v. Sokolow (1989), United States v. Sheikh (1981)

104 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions

71019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 952

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Carroll v. United States · Chimel v. California · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce · United States v. Martinez-Fuerte

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 135 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[R]easonableness” in the fourth amendment sense always depends upon a balance which must be struck between, on the one hand, the level of official intrusion into an individual privacy and, on the other hand, the public interest to be served by such an intrusion.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “flexible enough to afford the full measure of protection which the fourth amendment commands.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “such stops and searches need not be grounded in any particularized and articulable suspicion”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.