Beverly v. Wolkowitz’s Empirical Analysis
551 F.3d 1092 · 2008
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 544 · 11 U.S.C. § 727 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Mason v. Integrity Insurance · Huene v. United States · Stern 00-56431 v. H H H · Wolkowitz v. Beverly (In Re Beverly) · Lievsay v. Western Financial Savings Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The BAP held that the Beverlys’ transfer of assets through a marital settlement agreement was an avoidable transfer pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 544 (b) and [the UFTA]. The BAP also rejected the argument that our decision in Gill v. Stern (In re Stern), 345 F.3d 1036 (9th Cir.2003), allowed the transfer in this case. We have jurisdiction to consider the avoidance claims ... and adopt as our own the well-reasoned BAP opinion, In re Beverly, 374 B.R. 221 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.