In re Limitnone, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
551 F.3d 572 · 2008
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably United States v. Blewett (2013), Aftab v. Gonzalez (2009)
6 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 301 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1400 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Younger v. Harris · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp. · Moor v. County of Alameda
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... [T]he Supreme Court has consistently held that there is no mandatory sequencing of jurisdictional issues.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“does not entail any assumption by the court of substantive law-declaring power.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“grounds for denying audience to a case on the merits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.