Freistak v. Egger’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2003
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6851 · 26 U.S.C. § 7421 · 26 U.S.C. § 7429 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Relies on Loretto v. United States · Joyce v. United States · 475 F. Supp. 297 - McAvoy v. Internal Revenue Service · Nichols v. United States · United States v. Fidelity and Deposit Co. Of Maryland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]henever it appears by suggestion of the parties or otherwise that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter, the court shall dismiss the action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Nothing in the statute requires that an administrative decision be made before it is incumbent upon one to seek judicial review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.