Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 551 P2D 1146 - Wiley v. State

Wiley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
February 2011
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2011

11 state decisions

6019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harrison v. State · 17 Okla. Crim. 291 - Newby v. State · Overstreet v. State · Warner v. State · 10 Okla. Crim. 233 - Sayers v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The defendant’s final assignment of error contends that the trial court erred in failing to submit manslaughter instructions to the jury. We must disagree. In Harrison v. State, Okl.Cr., 461 P.2d 1007 , this Court citing Newby v. State, 17 Okl.Cr. 291 , 188 P. 124 , and Sayers et al. v. State, 10 Okl.Cr. 233 , 135 P. 1073 , held that when a defendant, who has a right of election as to several defenses, takes the stand as a witness and makes such admissions as to render every theory of defense unavailable save one, he will be deemed to have elected that one. “In the instant case the defense was that defendant did not fire at the victim but shot in the air, and that the fatal shot was in fact fired by one William Washington. The defendant was either innocent or guilty of Murder in the Second Degree and the trial court committed no error in failing to submit a manslaughter instruction to the jury. The defendant’s last assignment of error is without merit.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.