Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 551 So. 2d 1126 - Luttrell v. State

551 So. 2d 1126 - Luttrell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1995
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Bumper v. North Carolina · Spano v. People of the State of New York · Scott v. Ohio · United States v. Recalde

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`The abhorrence of society to the use of involuntary confessions does not turn alone on their inherent untrustworthiness. It also turns on the deep-rooted feeling that the police must obey the law while enforcing the law; that in the end life and liberty can be as much endangered from illegal methods used to convict those thought to be criminals as from the actual criminals themselves.'"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"`First, there must be clear and positive testimony that the consent was unequivocal and specific. Second, the Government must establish that the consent was given without duress or coercion. Finally, we evaluate those first two standards with the traditional indulgence of the courts against a presumption of waiver of constitutional rights.'"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “As to Investigator Batson's further promise to the appellant that he would inform the district attorney of the appellant's cooperation, the Alabama Supreme Court has recently held that such a promise may render a confession involuntary. Ex parte Weeks, 531 So.2d 643 (Ala.1988).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.