Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 551 So. 2d 1257 - LDP v. State

551 So. 2d 1257 - LDP v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
February 2000
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hetland v. State · State v. Hetland · 537 So. 2d 1080 - Gipson v. State · 337 So. 2d 1031 - Lewis v. State · 511 So. 2d 698 - Cobb v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no description of any of the individuals allegedly selling drugs, no indication of their heights, ages, clothing, etc., and no description of the activities the individuals were allegedly engaged in, and no indication of what types of drugs the individuals would be selling.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`[e]ven assuming the individuals' attempts to”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.