551 So. 2d 1303 - State v. Simpson’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 48 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably United States v. Pearson (2000), Tyson v. Trigg (1995)
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 48 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Turner v. Louisiana · Commonwealth v. Thompson · Cruz v. Abbate · 66 Wis. 2d 350 - Hadley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[To] meet due process requirements, capital and other felony cases must be allotted for trial to the various divisions of the court, or to judges assigned criminal court duty, on a random or rotating basis or under some other procedure adopted by the court which does not vest the district attorney with power to choose the judge to whom a particular case is assigned or the date on which a particular case is to be tried.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Gomez · State v. Kimmel“[d]ue process of law requires fundamental fairness, i.e., a fair trial in a fair tribunal.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[s]ince adequate notice is a fundamental element of due process, (citation omitted), the criminal docket for a particular day must indicate the order in which cases are to be called for trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.