Tillotson v. Anders’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably 669 So. 2d 56 - Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. v. Berry (1996), 562 So. 2d 1212 - City of Mound Bayou v. Johnson (1990)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 431 So. 2d 454 - Tideway Oil Programs, Inc. v. Serio · Francis v. Flinn · 539 So. 2d 1338 - Hall v. State · 469 So. 2d 55 - Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. v. Holland · 507 So. 2d 332 - Dye v. State Ex Rel. Hale
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where there appears from the face of a well-pleaded complaint an independent basis for equity jurisdiction, our chancery courts may hear and adjudge law claims.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“the right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“No judgment or decree in any chancery or circuit court rendered in a civil cause shall be reversed or annulled on the ground of want of jurisdiction to render said judgment or decree, from any error or mistake as to whether the cause in which it was rendered was of equity or common-law jurisdiction; but if the Supreme Court shall find error in the proceedings other than as to jurisdiction, and it shall be necessary to remand the case, the Supreme Court may remand it to that court which, in its opinion, can best determine the controversy.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.