¶1Ronald Sikora appeals his convictions and sentences for one count of grand theft and ten counts of uttering a forged instrument, claiming that double jeopardy bars convictions and sentences for both the grand theft and the uttering charges. The state concedes, pursuant to Monier v. State, 539 So.2d 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), that the trial court erred in convicting and sentencing Sikora for both uttering a forged instrument and grand theft. Accordingly, Sikora’s conviction and sentence for grand theft are reversed and the case remanded for resentencing.
551 So. 2d 613
551 So.2d 613
14 Fla.L.Weekly 2641
Sikora v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 15, 1989
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-11-15
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1991
3 state decisions
Relies on State, Department of Transportation v. Arms
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1989-11-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →