Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

551 So. 2d 653

Forstall v. Daigrepont

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1989

Louisiana Court of Appeal · decided 1989-09-28

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1997

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-09-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

¶2Plaintiff, Barry A. Forstall, has filed an application for rehearing in this matter. In his application, plaintiff alleges that the opinion of this Court rendered on September 28, 1989 is incorrect as to the date of the accident and the dates of the resulting treatment of two of the medical doctors.

¶3Our review of the record reveals the following:

1. The date of the vehicular collision made the subject of this lawsuit occurred on July 21, 1984.
2. Dr. C.B. Scrignar began treating plaintiff on March 24, 1986 approximately one year and eight months after the accident.
3. Dr. Robert Newman began treating plaintiff on March 1, 1985, approximately eight months after the accident.

¶4Our opinion rendered on September 28, 1989 is hereby amended to reflect the above corrections. Except as amended herein, the application for rehearing is denied.

/551/so2d/653 · .json · Public domain