Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 551 SO2D 914 - Ogle v. Long

Ogle v. Long’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
3
states following
November 2005
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 531 So. 2d 860 - Bussey v. John Deere Co. · Alabama Power Company v. Taylor · Van Hoozer v. Farmers Insurance Exchange · 51 Ala. App. 426 - State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Inc. v. Griffin · Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. Ford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The standard of appellate review applicable to a motion for directed verdict is identical to the standard used by the trial court in granting or denying the motion initially. Thus, when reviewing the trial court's ruling on the motion, we determine whether there was sufficient evidence to produce a conflict warranting jury consideration. And, like the trial court, we must view any evidence most favorably to the nonmovant. Bussey v. John Deere Co. , 531 So.2d 860 (Ala. 1988)."”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “reasonable diligence to ascertain [whether the alleged tortfeasor was uninsured] and such information was unobtainable,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"We do not believe that merely filing the lawsuit and taking a default judgment against the tort-feasor after he failed to answer the complaint and respond to discovery is sufficient to demonstrate 'reasonable diligence' in ascertaining and proving the tort-feasor's status as uninsured. The claimant must go further to meet his burden."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.