Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 551 SW3D 671 - Eye v. State

Eye v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Worthington v. State · Gehrke v. State · Johnson v. State · Forrest v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Issues that could have been raised on direct appeal-even if constitutional claims-may not be raised in postconviction motions, except where fundamental fairness requires otherwise and only in rare and exceptional circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] juror misconduct claim amounting to a constitutional error can only be raised in a Rule 29.15 motion when the factual basis of the juror misconduct was not discovered until after the trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.