Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 552 F.2d 1033 - Alphin v. Henson

Alphin v. Henson’s Empirical Analysis

552 F.2d 1033 · 1977

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2017 · most notably 23 Cal. 3d 917 - Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los Angeles (1979), Bell v. Thompson (2005)

32 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

15019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 12 (§ 1 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 2 (§ 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 26 (§ 16 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914)

Relies on Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond · Perkins v. Standard Oil Co. of California · Gradsky v. United States · Meredith v. Fair

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “holding ... on the principle that a court is to apply the law in effect at the time it renders its decision unless doing so would result in manifest injustice or there is statutory direction or legislative history to the contrary.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(o)ur control over a judgment of our court continues until our mandate has issued,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in exceptional cases, we may even recall our mandate to avoid injustice”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.