Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 552 F.2d 1086 - Stuart N. Allen v. Paul C. Carlotti

Stuart N. Allen v. Paul C. Carlotti’s Empirical Analysis

552 F.2d 1086 · 1977

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
October 1998
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 1998

3 federal appellate ·

60197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Neff v. World Publishing Co. · Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. · 177 So. 2d 712 - Automatic Canteen Company of America v. Butler · Olin's, Inc. v. Avis Rental Car System of Florida, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(c) Motion and Proceedings Thereon. The motion shall be served at least 10 days before the time fixed for the hearing. The adverse party prior to the day of hearing may serve opposing affidavits. The judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. A summary judgment, interlocutory in character may be rendered on the issue of liability alone although there is a genuine issue as to the amount of damages. (Emphasis added).”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.