United States v. Chenaur’s Empirical Analysis
552 F.2d 294 · 1977
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently March 2012 · most notably United States v. Mehrmanesh (1982), United States v. Buckley (1982)
22 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1006 · 18 U.S.C. § 1621 · 18 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Hamling v. United States · Hagner v. United States · United States v. Debrow · White v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Frankly, we fail to see what Federal Home Loan Bank Board policy has to do with a crime charged under 18 U.S.C. § 1006 . Either a crime has been committed under § 1006 or it has not regardless of Federal Home Loan Bank Board policy- id. at 298 n. 5.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“essential facts necessary to apprise a defendant of the crime charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.