Donald Ray Anselmi v. The Denver Post, Inc., a Colorado Corporation, Raymond B. Whitaker v. The Denver Post, Inc., a Colorado Corporation’s Empirical Analysis
552 F.2d 316 · 1977
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently November 2009 · most notably Rambo v. American Southern Insurance (1988), 580 F. Supp. 1082 - Davis v. Costa-Gavras (1984)
13 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Hanson v. Denckla · McGee v. International Life Insurance · 22 Ill. 2d 432 - Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp. · 11 Ill. 2d 378 - Nelson v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"`... to hold that the place of printing and issuing the paper is the only place where such prosecution can take place might also lead to great abuse, and would, for instance, enable a newspaper, printed outside of the state but circulated within it, to vilify citizens of this state without restraint, leaving the latter virtually helpless victims in the hands of the unscrupulous, even though the authors of a libel should live in this state or could be reached within it subsequent to the publication... .'"”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Whether there is a First Amendment defense is to be determined when the case is tried and ought not as a matter of reason and logic affect the outcome of a personal jurisdiction question such as we have here .... To hold as did the Fifth Circuit that the First Amendment has to be thrown on the scales as an added impediment in media cases gives the media an additional arrow which is not appropriate in a determination as to whether the contacts are legally sufficient to constitute due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(iv) causing tortious injury in this state by an act or omission outside this state if he regularly does or solicits business, or engages in any other persistent course of conduct in this state or derives substantial revenue from goods consumed or services used in this state;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.