Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 552 F.2d 745 - Aldens, Inc. v. LaFollette

Aldens, Inc. v. LaFollette’s Empirical Analysis

552 F.2d 745 · 1977

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
7
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably Aldens, Inc. v. Miller (1979), 34 Cal. 3d 839 - Illinois Commercial Men's Ass'n v. State Board of Equalization (1983)

11 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions

110197719801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McGowan v. State of Maryland Gallagher · Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States · Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. · Whalen v. Roe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he connection between a state and the regulated person must be of a more substantial character than the 'minimum contacts' needed to support judicial process running against a person.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he power to tax is a dominant power over commerce .... [a]ttempts at such taxation have always been more carefully scrutinized and more consistently resisted than police power regulations of aspects of [interstate] commerce.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[So] long as the interstate trader’s conduct has a “connection in fact” with a state producing an effect within a state, the interstate character of his conduct is only an element of the Pike interest-balancing analysis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.