Tamari v. Conrad’s Empirical Analysis
552 F.2d 778 · 1977
Citation profile
35 federal appellate · 3 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Corey v. New York Stock Exchange (1982), Ashbrook v. Hoffman (1980)
35 federal appellate · 3 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cahn v. International Ladies' Garment Union · Food Handlers Local 425 v. Pluss Poultry, Inc. · 263 F. Supp. 324 - Hill v. Aro Corporation · Local 227, International Hod Carriers, Building & Common Laborers Union of America v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We hold that arbitral immunity should be extended to cases where the authority of an arbitrator to resolve a dispute is challenged. ... [Individuals cannot be expected to volunteer to arbitrate disputes if they can be caught up in the struggle between the litigants and saddled with the burdens of defending a lawsuit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“... it appears that the arbitrators' award has not yet been enforced. Consequently, a declaration that the award was void would still be of great assistance to [Appellants] and we therefore find that the case is not moot.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that the district court correctly dismissed the action because arbitrators are immune from suit with respect to questions involving their authority to resolve a dispute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.