United States v. McCaleb’s Empirical Analysis
552 F.3d 1053 · 2009
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Olano · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · Lowenfield v. Phelps · Brasfield v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“knowingly” was not plain error)); see also United States v. Garza-Juarez, 992 F.2d 896 , 910 (9th Cir.1993) (holding that failure to define”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.