Blausey v. U.S. Trustee’s Empirical Analysis
552 F.3d 1124 · 2009
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably Egebjerg v. Anderson (2009), In re Turner (2009)
13 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 1 U.S.C. § 112 · 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 707 · 26 U.S.C. § 104 · 26 U.S.C. § 61 (Payment-in-Kind Tax Treatment Act of 1983) · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1453 (§ 5 of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Bowles v. Russell · Lamie v. United States Trustee · Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co. · United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc. · Collins v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he general rule of statutory construction is that the enumeration of specific exclusions from the operation of a statute is an indication that the statute should apply to all cases not specifically excluded.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(A) No judge, United States trustee (or bankruptcy administrator, if any), trustee, or other party in interest may file a motion under paragraph (2) if the current monthly income of the debtor, or in a joint case, the debtor and the debt- or’s spouse, as of the date of the order for relief, when multiplied by 12, is equal ' to or less than— ?|f (ii) in the case of a debtor in a household of 2, 3, or 4 individuals, the highest median family income of the applicable State for a family of the same number or fewer individuals....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Norenberg“The phrase “without regard to whether such income is taxable income” in 11 U.S.C. § 101 (10A)(A) reflects Congress’ judgment that the Internal Revenue Code’s method of determining taxable income does not apply to the Bankruptcy Code’s calculation of [current monthly income]. 23”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.