RoDa Drilling Co. v. Siegal’s Empirical Analysis
552 F.3d 1203 · 2009
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 32 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Alliance for Wild Rockies v. Cottrell (2011), United States v. Nacchio (2009)
18 federal appellate · 32 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · eBay Inc. v. MERCEXCHANGE, LL · Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União Do Vegetal · Narragansett Indian Tribe v. Guilbert · K-Mart Corporation v. Oriental Plaza Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) a likelihood of success on the merits; (2) a likelihood that the movant will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief; (3) that the balance of equities tips in the movant's favor; and (4) that the injunction is in the public interest.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a significant risk that [the moving party] will experience harm that eannot be compensated after the fact by monetary damages”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) preliminary injunctions that alter the status quo; (2) mandatory preliminary injunctions; and (3) preliminary injunctions that afford the movant all the relief that it could recover at the conclusion of a full trial on the merits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.