In re Sealed Case’s Empirical Analysis
552 F.3d 841 · 2009
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2022
11 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3582 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 856 (§ 416 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Booker · Gall v. United States · United States v. Olano · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Singleton v. Wulff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“prevent one party from sandbagging another by raising new claims on appeal”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[W]e review a sentencing court's factual determinations for clear error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.