Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

552 F. App'x 265

Howard v. Abingdon

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided January 27, 2014

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2014-01-27

Decided 2014-01-27

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Andre J. Howard appeals the district court’s order striking Howard’s complaint from the docket. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Howard v. Abingdon, VA, No. l:13-mc-00076-JPJ (W.D.Va. Oct. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

/552/fappx/265 · .json · Public domain