Strothman v. Gefreh’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
February 1985
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Butz v. Economou · Barr v. Matteo · Preble v. Johnson · Zelner B. Sowders and Reta M. Sowders v. W. B. Damron
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““in response to either memos from AU Strothman and his superior, Carney, or earlier meetings and personal conferences on related subjects. In none of the writings complained of ... did the AU in question initiate the correspondence. In each instance the letters involved managerial duties and performance eval uations of personnel in the Denver Hearing Office. The issue arose because of dissension between AU Strothman and the other AUs and their support staff, concerning Strothman’s expectations, and the manner in which he handled his administrative and supervisory duties.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Strothman v. Gefreh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.