Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 552 FSUPP 528 - Cloud v. Olin Corp.

Cloud v. Olin Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2011

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

201982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Maloy v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of West Palm Beach · 368 So. 2d 516 - Garrett v. Raytheon Co., Inc. · Howell v. City of Dothan · 369 So. 2d 523 - Borland v. Sanders Lead Co., Inc. · Kelly v. Shropshire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It was thus that in American Mutual Liability Insurance Co. v. Agricola Furnace Co., 236 Ala. 535, 183 So. 677 (1938), this Court held that recovery for a continuous tort could be had only for those damages which occurred within the period of limitations. See also Howell v. City of Dothan, 234 Ala. 158, 174 So. 624 (1937). The cause of action was, therefore not barred by the statute of limitations until one year after the last day on which the plaintiff was exposed to the dangerous conditions which caused the injury. Minyard v. Woodward Iron Co., 81 F.Supp. 414 (N.D.Ala.), aff'd, 170 F.2d 508 (5th Cir.1948). This was, and is, the rule in all cases concerning continuous torts in Alabama.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.