State v. Richards’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably United States v. Anderson (1998), State v. Harmon (1998)
2 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Wong Sun v. United States · Katz v. United States · Faretta v. California · Carroll v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“standby counsel should also fill the role of `second chair' counsel and be ready to step in to continue the trial should the defendant be unable or unwilling to continue his or her own defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harmon“A defendant who cannot demonstrate a legitimate expectation of privacy relating to the area searched or the item seized will not have standing to contest the legality of the search or seizure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sletten“). We have held that the district court may rescind the pro se status of a defendant who "`deliberately engages in serious and obstructionist misconduct'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Christian
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.