Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 552 P2D 150 - Andrews v. State

Andrews v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently May 2015 · most notably Leuch v. State (1981), Brezenoff v. State (1983)

39 state decisions

19019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Chaney · Nicholas v. State · Galaktionoff v. State · Davenport v. State · Robinson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. requires that we make our own examination of the record with particular emphasis on the nature of the crime, the defendant’s character, and the need for protection of the public. The controlling standard of review in sentence appeal matters is whether the trial court’s sentence was ‘clearly mistaken.’ 8”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]n determining whether a given sentence is excessive or overly lenient, we will consider the total sentence entered including any period of suspension or deferred imposition.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “We have stated on numerous occasions that the sentencing goals to be considered by a judge in determining an appropriate sentence for a particular offense include not only rehabilitation of the offender, but in addition, isolation of the offender in order to protect the public, deterrence of the offender and of other members of the community who might possess similar criminal tendencies and reaffirmation of societal norms embodying condemnation of the unlawful acts performed by the guilty person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.