Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 552 P2D 342 - Hoskins v. State

Hoskins v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
2
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Stephens v. State (1989), ABC Builders, Inc. v. Phillips (1981)

37 state decisions

17019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wade · Allen v. United States · Rogers v. United States · Fillippon v. Albion Vein Slate Co. · Shields v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “After the jurors have retired for deliberation, if there is a disagreement between them as to any part of the testimony, or if they desire to be informed as to any part of the law arising in the case, they may request the officer to conduct them to the court where information upon the matter of law shall be given. The court may give its recollection as to the testimony on the points in dispute, in the presence of or after notice to the parties or their counsel.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “That a defendant is entitled to be represented by counsel at all stages of the proceeding is without question.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to be confronted with the witnesses against him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.