State v. Vanderlinder’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 454 So. 2d 93 - State v. Nuccio · 541 So. 2d 818 - State v. Johnson · 421 So. 2d 843 - State v. Robertson · Llorence v. Natchitoches Parish School Bd. · 527 So. 2d 411 - State v. Andrews
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“At about 8:00 p.m. on December 27, 1987, Detectives Davis and Simone of the Jefferson Parish Sheriff's office, narcotics division, went to the New Orleans International airport to meet with a Delta Airlines employee who had telephoned Detective Davis. Acting on information obtained from the Delta employee, the detectives retrieved a certain piece of luggage which arrived on Delta flight 535 at 10:00 p.m. The piece of luggage in question, a black suitcase with a tag giving the owner's name as Jose Ramirez and a Florida address, had been mishandled in Miami and sent first to Atlanta by Delta employees. At Detective Davis' request, Agent Pat McCumber, who is assigned to the Sheriff's office and handles drug detector dogs, arrived at the airport to conduct a "luggage line-up." As the officers brought the suitcase into the baggage room to set up the line-up, Detective Davis noticed the defendant step out of the line formed in front of the baggage claim office and look at the suitcase and the officers. The defendant repeated the action a second time but this time he turned and began walking hastily toward the exit. As he walked away the defendant motioned to Juan Medina who was in the opposite end of the baggage claim area. The men met and retreated together rapidly to the door. Officers Davis and Simone caught up to the defendants and asked for identification. Vanderlinder produced a resident alien card. In response to Officer Simone's request for additional identification, Vander”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(2) Another crime committed or alleged to have been committed by the defendant as to which evidence is not admissible; ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.